Skip to main content
SYS · ONLINEPASS · 63.0%
Open Assay
Independent Testing / Est. 2026
BATCH04·26·B
PASS63.0%
N27
PeptidesCosmeticTetrapeptide-21

Tetrapeptide-21

/ Synthetic tetrapeptide; INCI 'Tetrapeptide-21'; photoaging-focused cosmetic peptide
SPECULATIVEN = 0 · TESTING PENDING

ALIAS · Biopeptide-21 · Tetrapeptide-21 (INCI)

Pass rate
0
Samples
0
Suppliers
Research use onlyAny dose figures below describe what specific cited studies used, reported factually. Nothing on this page is guidance for human use.READ FIRST →

Terms in this page you can click for a plain-English popup: , , , , , , , .

§ A · Identity
Primary sequence— sequence not captured —
MW · CLASS · Synthetic tetrapeptide; INCI 'Tetrapeptide-21'; photoaging-focused cosmetic peptideCATEGORY · Cosmetic

Tier 4. Tetrapeptide-21 is a synthetic four-residue cosmetic peptide marketed under the trade name Biopeptide-21 (Sederma) for photoaging-focused applications, principally extracellular-matrix stimulation in dermal fibroblast cultures. The mechanistic basis derives from supplier in-vitro work on collagen and hyaluronic acid synthesis. Independent randomised topical-efficacy trials versus placebo are sparse in the indexed primary literature.

§ B · Mechanism of action

Supplier-published work positions Tetrapeptide-21 as a stimulator of dermal fibroblast extracellular-matrix synthesis — increased expression of type I collagen, hyaluronic acid, and laminin-5 in cell-based assays — with proposed downstream cosmetic effects on dermal density and photoaging endpoints. The specific receptor or signalling pathway driving the in-vitro signal has not been definitively characterised in independent primary literature.

§ C · Human clinical evidence

Tier 4. Mechanism of action data are predominantly in-vitro and supplier-sponsored. Topical-efficacy work in human cosmetic application has principally been conducted by the supplier or contracted laboratories rather than in independent randomised trials.

§ F · Safety signal

No formal independent safety database beyond supplier patch-test and cosmetic-tolerability work. Systemic exposure from topical application is presumed low.

§ H · Regulatory status

Regulatory status

FDA status:
Not FDA-approved
§ I · Notable gaps and controversies

As with most INCI-numbered cosmetic peptides, the asymmetry between supplier in-vitro mechanistic claims and independent topical-efficacy data is the central evidentiary issue. Vendor product specifications (peptide sequence, purity, vehicle) are not always disclosed at point of sale.