Enclomiphene
/ Selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM); trans-isomer of clomiphene citrateALIAS · Trans-clomiphene · Enclomiphene citrate · Repros enclomiphene · Androxal
Terms in this page you can click for a plain-English popup: , , , , , , , .
Tier 2. The trans-isomer of clomiphene; advanced through Phase 3 trials by Repros Therapeutics for secondary hypogonadism (low testosterone with preserved fertility) and received an FDA Complete Response Letter rather than approval (2015). Multiple Phase 2 and Phase 3 datasets exist; not currently FDA-approved as a separate product, although clomiphene citrate (a mixture of enclomiphene and zuclomiphene) is approved for ovulation induction.
Enclomiphene is a SERM that competitively blocks estrogen-receptor feedback in the hypothalamus and pituitary, increasing GnRH pulsatility, LH and FSH secretion, and downstream testicular testosterone and spermatogenesis. The pharmacology contrasts with exogenous testosterone replacement, which suppresses the HPG axis and impairs fertility. Zuclomiphene (the cis-isomer of clomiphene) has agonist estrogen-receptor activity that contributes to side-effect profile of clomiphene mixture; isolating the trans-isomer was intended to improve tolerability.
Tier 2. Phase 3 trials in men with secondary hypogonadism showed significant testosterone elevation and preserved sperm parameters versus testosterone gel. FDA Complete Response Letter (2015) cited concerns about long-term cardiovascular safety and the size of the safety database in the proposed indication.
In Phase 2-3 trials, headaches, hot flashes, nausea, and visual disturbances were the most common adverse events. Long-term cardiovascular data in the male hypogonadism population were the main FDA concern.
Regulatory status
- FDA status:
- Not FDA-approved
- Compounding:
- Compounding eligibility ambiguous
The 'enclomiphene' peptide-vendor product overlaps a pharmacy compounding niche — some 503A-pathway compounding pharmacies prepare enclomiphene as an unapproved drug for hypogonadism. The pharmacological case is reasonable; the regulatory status is the weak point.