Skip to main content
SYS · ONLINEPASS · 63.0%
Open Assay
Independent Testing / Est. 2026
BATCH04·26·B
PASS63.0%
N27
PeptidesCosmetic, HealingEGF (Epidermal Growth Factor)

EGF (Epidermal Growth Factor)

/ Recombinant human epidermal growth factor; EGFR ligand
TIER 2 · TranslationalN = 0 · TESTING PENDINGMW 6045.00 g·mol⁻¹

ALIAS · rhEGF · Recombinant EGF · Heberprot-P (Cuban; intralesional formulation) · Easyef (Korean)

Pass rate
0
Samples
0
Suppliers
Research use onlyAny dose figures below describe what specific cited studies used, reported factually. Nothing on this page is guidance for human use.READ FIRST →

Terms in this page you can click for a plain-English popup: , , , , , , , .

§ A · Identity
Primary sequence— sequence not captured —
MW · 6045.00CLASS · Recombinant human epidermal growth factor; EGFR ligandCATEGORY · Cosmetic, Healing

Tier 2. Recombinant human EGF is approved in Cuba as Heberprot-P intralesional injection for severe diabetic foot ulcers (since 2006) and in Korea as Easyef topical solution for diabetic foot ulcer. Not FDA-approved in the United States. Phase 3 trials in Cuba and Korea support the regional approvals; vendor research-grade EGF protein sold by peptide suppliers is preclinical-grade material and is not pharmaceutically equivalent to the approved formulations.

§ B · Mechanism of action

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a 53-residue peptide originally isolated by Stanley Cohen (Nobel Prize 1986, shared with Rita Levi-Montalcini). EGF binds the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR / ERBB1), a receptor tyrosine kinase whose activation drives Ras-MAPK, PI3K-Akt, and PLC-gamma signalling, promoting epithelial cell proliferation, migration, and wound re-epithelialisation. In diabetic foot ulcer pharmacology, intralesional or topical EGF supplementation is hypothesised to compensate for impaired endogenous growth-factor signalling in the diabetic wound microenvironment, accelerating granulation and closure.

§ C · Human clinical evidence

Tier 2. The Heberprot-P Phase 3 program in Cuba (Berlanga 2009 and subsequent registries) randomised severe diabetic foot ulcer patients to intralesional EGF versus placebo and reported higher complete granulation and reduced amputation rates. Korean studies of topical EGF (Easyef) in diabetic foot and other chronic wounds (Hong 2006 and others) supported the Korean approval. Western Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials of recombinant EGF for chronic wounds have produced more mixed results, contributing to the absence of FDA approval.

§ D · Primary literature
PubMed17007342Hong JP et al.Recombinant human epidermal growth factor (EGF) to enhance healing for diabetic foot ulcers · Annals of Plastic Surgery · human-phase-2Topical recombinant human EGF was associated with higher complete healing rates in diabetic foot ulcers compared with control over 12 weeks of treatment.Limitations: Modest sample size; single-centre; surrogate wound-closure endpoint; not the basis of FDA approval.2006
§ F · Safety signal

Heberprot-P intralesional injection has been associated with injection-site pain, burning, and chills in published trials; serious adverse events have been infrequent in the published Cuban registry. Topical EGF in Korean trials has been generally well tolerated. Theoretical concerns about EGFR-mediated proliferation and oncogenicity (EGFR is a recognised oncology target with multiple kinase inhibitors approved for EGFR-mutant cancers) have been a regulatory consideration but have not produced an observed clinical signal in the diabetic foot population in published follow-up.

§ H · Regulatory status

Regulatory status

FDA status:
Not FDA-approved
Compounding:
Compounding eligibility ambiguous
§ I · Notable gaps and controversies

The major translational gap is the difference between approved formulations (Heberprot-P intralesional vials, Easyef topical solution) manufactured under pharmaceutical GMP for human use, and vendor research-grade recombinant EGF protein sold by peptide suppliers, which has no human pharmaceutical specification. Western trials of EGF for chronic wounds have not consistently replicated the Cuban Heberprot-P results, and the reasons (formulation, delivery, patient selection, endpoint definition) are debated. EGFR oncology signalling remains a theoretical concern even with localised dosing.