Skip to main content
SYS · ONLINEPASS · 63.0%
Open Assay
Independent Testing / Est. 2026
BATCH04·26·B
PASS63.0%
N27
PeptidesLongevity, HealingCartalax

Cartalax

/ Khavinson-tradition tripeptide; proposed cartilage bioregulator
SPECULATIVEN = 0 · TESTING PENDING

ALIAS · AED variant (cartilage) · Cartilage peptide bioregulator

Pass rate
0
Samples
0
Suppliers
Research use onlyAny dose figures below describe what specific cited studies used, reported factually. Nothing on this page is guidance for human use.READ FIRST →

Terms in this page you can click for a plain-English popup: , , , , , , , .

§ A · Identity
Primary sequence— sequence not captured —
MW · CLASS · Khavinson-tradition tripeptide; proposed cartilage bioregulatorCATEGORY · Longevity, Healing

Tier 4. Cartalax is referenced in Khavinson-group review papers as a cartilage-targeted bioregulator within the peptide-bioregulator series. Indexed PubMed primary literature isolating cartalax as the studied agent (rather than mentioning it as one of a panel) is not identifiable.

§ B · Mechanism of action

Cartalax is presented in the Khavinson peptide-bioregulator framework as a short peptide proposed to act on cartilage tissue (chondrocyte proliferation, extracellular-matrix remodelling). The class-level mechanistic hypothesis is sequence-specific DNA binding and transcriptional modulation; cartalax-specific molecular characterisation is absent from indexed primary literature.

§ C · Human clinical evidence

Tier 4. No peptide-specific clinical or preclinical study with cartalax as the named agent in indexed PubMed literature. No replicated independent evidence base.

§ F · Safety signal

No formal human safety database. No peptide-specific safety record.

§ H · Regulatory status

Regulatory status

FDA status:
Not FDA-approved
§ I · Notable gaps and controversies

Russian-origin literature (Khavinson group, Saint-Petersburg Institute of Bioregulation and Gerontology) without independent Western replication. Cartalax as a distinctly studied compound is essentially absent from the indexed primary record — the cartilage-bioregulator role is asserted in review and product material rather than established by replicated peer-reviewed studies. Vendor sales presume cartilage-specific bioactivity that the published record does not establish.